In simple terms
A friendly intro before the formal notes — no formulas yet.
Policies to correct imbalances in the current account of the balance of payments
9708 AS - correcting trade deficits via expenditure and competitiveness policies.
- 1
A current account deficit means a country spends more on foreign goods and services than it earns from its exports.
- 2
Policies are broadly categorised as expenditure-reducing, expenditure-switching, and supply-side.
- 3
Expenditure-reducing policies tackle AD to lower import spending.
- 4
Expenditure-switching policies aim to make exports cheaper and imports more expensive.
Explore the concept
Use the live diagram and synced steps — play it or tap a step card to walk through.
1 more simulation for this topic — run them in the Simulations section below
Simulations
Every simulation here runs the real model — try the steps on a card, then check what you see against the notes.
1 simulation
- GeoGebra9708 6.5
Foreign exchange market
The market for Currency 1: Demand and Supply lines with blue handles to drag, the exchange rate (Currency 2 per Currency 1) and quantity Qe.
Try this
- Drag Supply of the currency to the right: the exchange rate falls (a depreciation).
- Say what that does to the price of exports abroad and of imports at home.
Look for A lower exchange rate is an expenditure-switching policy: exports become cheaper and imports dearer, which can narrow a current account deficit.
Craig Burt · GeoGebra · GeoGebra Terms of Service
At a glance — side by side
Compare key properties side by side — ideal for exam contrasts.
Comparison of Expenditure-Reducing and Expenditure-Switching Policies
| Feature | Expenditure-Reducing Policies | Expenditure-Switching Policies |
|---|---|---|
| Main Aim | To reduce overall aggregate demand (AD) in the economy. | To change relative prices and encourage a switch from foreign to domestic goods. |
| Policy Tools | Contractionary fiscal policy (↑Taxes, ↓Govt Spending); Contractionary monetary policy (↑Interest Rates). | Devaluation/depreciation of the exchange rate; Protectionism (tariffs, quotas). |
| Impact on Domestic Economy | Reduces economic growth and can cause a recession; increases unemployment. | Can cause cost-push inflation (due to more expensive imports); may boost export-oriented industries. |
| Primary Weakness | Creates a major conflict with objectives of economic growth and full employment. | Effectiveness depends on elasticities (Marshall-Lerner); risks retaliation from other countries. |
| Speed of Impact | Relatively fast, especially changes in interest rates. | Slower, with a time lag before spending patterns change (J-curve effect). |
Main Aim
Expenditure-Reducing Policies
Expenditure-Switching Policies
Policy Tools
Expenditure-Reducing Policies
Expenditure-Switching Policies
Impact on Domestic Economy
Expenditure-Reducing Policies
Expenditure-Switching Policies
Primary Weakness
Expenditure-Reducing Policies
Expenditure-Switching Policies
Speed of Impact
Expenditure-Reducing Policies
Expenditure-Switching Policies
Full topic notes
Formal explanation with the rigour you need for the exam.
Understanding Policies to Correct a Current Account Deficit
A persistent current account deficit, where the value of imports of goods and services exceeds exports, poses significant macroeconomic challenges. To correct this imbalance, governments can employ two main categories of policies. The first, expenditure-reducing policies, aim to lower aggregate demand (AD) across the economy, thereby reducing demand for imports. The second, expenditure-switching policies, seek to encourage domestic consumers and firms to switch their spending from foreign-made goods to domestically-produced alternatives. A third, longer-term approach involves supply-side policies designed to enhance the international competitiveness of a country's industries. The choice and effectiveness of these policies depend on the underlying causes of the deficit and other macroeconomic objectives. It is also important to consider how the deficit is financed; a deficit financed by long-term foreign direct investment (FDI) that boosts productive capacity may be more sustainable than one financed by short-term borrowing.
A current account deficit means a country spends more on foreign goods and services than it earns from its exports.
Policies are broadly categorised as expenditure-reducing, expenditure-switching, and supply-side.
Expenditure-reducing policies tackle AD to lower import spending.
Expenditure-switching policies aim to make exports cheaper and imports more expensive.
Expenditure-Reducing Policies
These policies work by deliberately dampening aggregate demand, which reduces overall spending in the economy, including spending on imported goods and services. The primary tools are contractionary fiscal policy and contractionary monetary policy. Fiscal measures include increasing direct and indirect taxes (reducing disposable income and raising prices) or cutting government spending. Monetary measures involve the central bank raising interest rates, which makes borrowing more expensive for consumers and firms, discouraging consumption and investment. While effective at cutting import spending, these policies are a blunt instrument that can cause a recession, leading to higher unemployment and slower economic growth, creating a significant policy conflict.
Main Goal: Reduce aggregate demand (AD) to decrease spending on imports.
Fiscal Tools: Increase taxes (income, VAT), decrease government spending.
Monetary Tools: Increase interest rates, reduce the money supply.
Major Drawback: Can lead to recession, unemployment, and conflict with the economic growth objective.
Expenditure-Switching Policies
Expenditure-switching policies aim to alter the relative prices of domestic and foreign goods to encourage a switch in spending patterns. The main policy is a devaluation or depreciation of the currency's exchange rate. This makes a country's exports cheaper for foreign buyers and its imports more expensive for domestic buyers, aiming to increase export revenue and decrease import expenditure. Another approach is protectionism, using tariffs (taxes on imports), quotas (limits on import quantities), and other trade barriers. While a weaker currency can be effective, its success depends on the Marshall-Lerner condition. Protectionism is often criticised for inviting retaliation from trading partners and protecting inefficient domestic industries.
Main Goal: Make domestic goods relatively cheaper and more attractive than foreign goods.
Policy Tools: Devaluation/depreciation of the exchange rate, tariffs, quotas, and import controls.
Devaluation's success is contingent on the Marshall-Lerner condition (PEDx + PEDm > 1).
Drawbacks: Protectionism can lead to retaliatory measures; devaluation can cause cost-push inflation.
When evaluating devaluation, always discuss the Marshall-Lerner condition and the J-curve effect. The J-curve illustrates that the current account may worsen in the short term after a devaluation before it improves, due to low short-run price elasticities of demand for exports and imports.
Supply-Side Policies for International Competitiveness
Unlike demand-side policies, supply-side policies offer a long-term solution by tackling the root causes of a lack of competitiveness. These policies aim to increase the efficiency, productivity, and quality of domestic industries, thereby making their exports more desirable and competitive on the world stage without needing to devalue the currency. Examples include investment in education and training to improve labour skills, deregulation to reduce business costs, privatisation to promote efficiency, and incentives for research and development (R&D) to foster innovation. While these policies are highly effective in the long run and avoid conflicts with other objectives like inflation, their primary drawback is the significant time lag before their effects are felt.
Main Goal: Improve the price and non-price competitiveness of domestic firms in the long run.
Policy Tools: Deregulation, privatisation, education and training, infrastructure investment, R&D grants.
Advantage: Addresses the fundamental cause of the deficit without causing unemployment or inflation.
Disadvantage: Significant time lags; benefits are not seen for many years.
Worked examples
See the formulas applied — reveal one step at a time, like the exam.
Country Z has a large current account deficit. Its government is considering:
(i) raising interest rates (ii) devaluing the currency (iii) investing in vocational training
Classify each policy and briefly evaluate its effectiveness in correcting the deficit.
- 1
Here is a breakdown and evaluation of each policy:
The nation of Atlantis is experiencing a current account deficit. Its trade data for the year is:
- Export Revenue: $400 billion
- Import Expenditure: $480 billion
The government of Atlantis decides to devalue its currency, the 'Shell', by 20%. The price elasticity of demand for its exports (PEDx) is estimated to be 0.9, and the price elasticity of demand for its imports (PEDm) is 0.7.
(a) Calculate the initial current account deficit. (b) Check if the Marshall-Lerner condition is satisfied. (c) Calculate the new value of export revenue and import expenditure following the devaluation. (d) Determine the new current account balance and evaluate the policy's success.
- 1
Step 1: Calculate the initial current account deficit. The current account balance is the value of exports minus the value of imports. Atlantis has an initial current account deficit of $80 billion.
How it all connects
The big idea sits in the middle — tap a linked idea to explore the link.
Tap a linked idea to see how it connects back to the main topic — that connection is what examiners reward.
Glossary
Key terms for this topic — skim now; the Check step will test them.
- Current account deficit
When debits on the current account (imports, income outflows, transfers out) exceed credits (exports, income inflows, transfers in).
- Expenditure-reducing
Contractionary fiscal or monetary policy that lowers AD and therefore spending on both domestic goods and imports.
- Expenditure-switching
Policies that redirect spending from imports to domestic goods - e.g. devaluation/depreciation, tariffs, quotas.
- Expenditure-reducing policies
Policies that aim to correct a current account deficit by reducing aggregate demand (AD), thereby lowering spending on imports. Examples include contractionary fiscal policy (higher taxes, lower government spending) and contractionary monetary policy (higher interest rates).
- Expenditure-switching policies
Policies that aim to correct a current account deficit by encouraging consumers to switch from foreign goods to domestic goods. Examples include devaluation/depreciation of the exchange rate and protectionist measures like tariffs and quotas.
Sort it out
One statement at a time, say which heading it belongs under. Every statement comes from this lesson’s side-by-side comparison.
To reduce overall aggregate demand (AD) in the economy.
Quick check
Write your answer first, then compare it with the model one — the gap is what you would have lost.
Teach it back
If you can explain it simply, you own it — gaps here are marks you’d lose.
Teach it back
Explain this topic as if teaching a friend. We name the gaps an examiner would still dock.
Revision flashcards
Guess first, then flip — retrieval beats re-reading.
Key takeaways
Review these before you close the topic — retrieval beats re-reading.
A current account deficit means a country spends more on foreign goods and services than it earns from its exports.
Policies are broadly categorised as expenditure-reducing, expenditure-switching, and supply-side.
Expenditure-reducing policies tackle AD to lower import spending.
Expenditure-switching policies aim to make exports cheaper and imports more expensive.
Practice — then mark it
The whole point: a real Cambridge question, marked mark-by-mark.
Consider the likely success of one policy that Chile could use to reduce the imports of consumer goods.
Extra simulations & links
PhET, GeoGebra and other curated tools — open in a new tab.
Frequently asked
Checkpoint
One marked question is worth ten re-reads — close the loop before you move on.
Reading it isn’t knowing it — prove it.
Before you move on: do 9708/22 · Q1(b) on paper, snap a photo, and get examiner-style feedback on exactly where you win and lose marks.
Discuss Policies to correct imbalances in the current account of the balance of payments
Ask, share and discuss with other Economics students